User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 2603:6081:c600:116:8847:31ab:b28c:ee2b (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ysjtst (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- 180.150.49.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- 171.7.109.246 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Guy450503 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Start of a wp:single-purpose account for vandalism, as first two edits are spamming pages with copy and pasted nonsense vandalism.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Level III. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- BidGic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User keeps editing XO to add the Geometry Dash level "xo" by the user KrmaL, linking to a draft article on the level, despite the consensus being that Geometry Dash levels do not belong in disambiguation pages (this is far from the first time that a disambiguation page has been edited to add a GD level). I'm not sure if the account should be blocked indefinitely or for a few days, but the user has added the GD level to the disambiguation page a total of 8 times, getting reverted each time. BombCraft8 (talk) (contributions) 02:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Chadpenguin0607 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. also see filter log, persistent attempts to add false informations. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:18, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- +1. Clearly WP:NOTHERE. — Chrisahn (talk) 02:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Calinsane26 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "insane|psychopath|criminal" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Biden69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 00:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Angelica(stillnotsatisfied) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Based Drenica (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Possibly a reference to the Drenica massacres, which they are calling "based". Probably not appropriate for someone editing in such a sensitive topic. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Regardless of username issues, I gave them the standard WP:CT/EE notice. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Or that's where they are based (ie where they live). It's a region. Secretlondon (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. I understand the concern behind the report but it is too open to interpretation for a no-warning block. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 20:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sdot-icg (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. WP:ORGNAME role account. Created copyvio Draft:Sivamani Paramesh, about an officer in the Indian Coast Guard. Username is a combination of "SDOT" (Software Development and Overseeing Team) and "ICG" (Indian Coast Guard). Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- I am without question a bipiolar alcoholic who says contradictory things every six m (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 22:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wait until the user edits. It's not so blatant or offensive to require a block when the user has zero edits and nothing deleted or caught by the filter log. Red Phoenix talk 02:17, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant pushing of the unsuitable source SimpleFlying contrary to WP:SIMPLEFLYING. The Banner talk 12:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- I do not think protection is the right instrument to use here. Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 14:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Forum comments are being added by IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts due to the election. I think one month of protection would be good. GrabUp - Talk 14:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, contentious issue, should be protected like how Hezbollah/Israel conflict and Gaza/Israel war categories are. Thudinspecies (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- 2024 Turkish Aerospace Industries headquarters attack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: WP:BLPCRIME violations by IPs and possible CTOPS. Request same protections for 2024 Ankara attack. Borgenland (talk) 16:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think at this point it will be counterproductive, the recent IP edits are constructive. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring. Beshogur (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Can you check edit history. "quarantining" happens without protection! Weird. Beshogur (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalism. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: not even sure if this page should exist, but history is nothing but vandal rvs Tule-hog (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted the page and leave another admin to decide whether create-protection is needed. Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:MOREVOTE/WP:PANICVOTE at the XfD - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanyamjain. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Request for long term semi-protection as page is being vandalized by an editor using two or more IPs in order to insert and preserve WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Mr Fink (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: This individual recently died, and after his death allegations of child sexual abuse were published, and police confirmed he had been under investigation. The subject was even discussed in the media by the New Zealand prime minister. An anonymous IP editor has been removing references to these allegations, claiming they are false and defamatory. The issue has already been to WP:BLPN where it was determined that the abuse allegations should be included. I suspect the IP editor has an undeclared WP:COI given their tone and tenacity on this issue. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption particularly regarding changing the nationality of the company to Chinese. TylerBurden (talk) 22:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 22:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 23:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP Vandalism and POV push Vedant Katyayan (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP and new account vandalism, getting worse lately, probably related to Talk:Alan MacMasters hoax#Recent spike. — Chrisahn (talk) 01:27, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, WP:AP2. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please also enforce WP:CT/GENSEX. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated reverts of WP:GF edits by Mlb8589 who adds unverified/unverifiable location information to past champions table. Primary sources used for championship history do not include localities, though some added by Mlb8589 can be assumed to be correct—but not all. To verify would require parsing 40+ years of score recaps to determine which champions are from where… which has yet to be completed. Requesting revert to [1] and locking page to prevent WP:EW. Thosbsamsgom (talk) 03:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Averaging vandalism every 5.3 hours for the past 47.5 hours. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 03:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic, per WP:PIA. Zinderboff(talk) 03:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: No longer necessary low profile article ModernDaySlavery (talk) 02:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Airplaneman: last protecting admin...any thoughts on that? Lectonar (talk) 09:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page was given an indefinite protection in June 2014 when the subject agreed to move club, effective from July; there was disruptive editing jumping the gun. This is quite clearly not an ongoing issue. IPs can do well with updating things. The page was demoted from GA in 2019 due to lack of update and maintenance. Subject has gone from a high-profile player to an average manager, so risk of vandalism is decreased. Protecting admin has 50 edits in last two years. Unknown Temptation (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:
"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"
1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.
Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[2] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.
2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- @FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[3][4][5].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[6]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[7] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[8] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[6]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
- My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
- If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[11][12] and a form of Holocaust erasure[13], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[14][15][16][17]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[11][12] and a form of Holocaust erasure[13], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[14][15][16][17]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Inform readers of the distinction between the dagger symbol and the cross symbol in the infobox.
Under "Commanders and leaders" in the infobox Yahya Sinwar has a dagger next to his name, but others such as Marwan Issa have a cross next to their name. The distinction between these symbols is not immediately clear to someone reading the article, I feel that this should be explicitly noted on the page. The Elysian Vector Fields (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @TheElysianVectorFields: That isn't the article page, that's the infobox template. I changed the target for you above. It seems the dagger means "killed in action" (KIA) and the cross means "assassinated". I honestly don't know how I'd add a note to that effect. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure it out. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Move Saleh al-Arouri from military to political due to him being the Deputy Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau before his death ElementalKnight987654321 (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Add a map key indicating what color denotes "Lebanon under Israeli control" in the legend for the map showing the "Northern Israel sector of war." It is already shown in the file and on other pages that use this file, so this edit would merely be to align with the file and the other articles. 129,743rd user (talk) 00:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
The correct terms should be used! Zionism is a nationalistic movement. Zionists wanted to create a Jewish State in the land formerly known as Judea, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”); which at the time was ruled by a British Mandate. See Encyclopedia Britannica as a source. 2607:FEA8:565E:1000:DCA3:DB8A:B61C:5887 (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Then surely you can provide a citation to a source that Encyclopaedia Brittanica themselves cite? For something like this in this hellhole topic area, we'd need a better source than another encyclopaedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I removed the words due to multiple reason. 1) The statement "Lu Xun’s observed lack of evidence about the translation of the Ramayana is no true" is incorrect. The reference 12, an article by Xianlin Ji, clearly says that "It is plausible to say that Sun Wukong came through the South China Sea instead of coming directly from India." 2) This whole paragraph is obviously unrelated to SunWuKong, especially when there is no evidence proving that it is inspired by Ramayana. 3) This paragraph is clearly an introduction of Ramayana's influence in asia. It should be under the page Ramayana.
“However, recent research has suggested that Lu Xun’s observed lack of evidence about the translation of the Ramayana is not true.[12][13] The Indian literary scholar A. K. Ramanujan had written about the numerous versions of the Ramayana in India and around the world in his essay Three Hundred Ramayanas,[14] he looks at examples from Southeast Asia, and mentions how countries like Tibet, Thailand, Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, Java and Indonesia, all of these regions and countries have their native Ramayanas. He looks particularly at the Thai version of the Ramayana, the Ramakien, and the changes in narrative and characterisation. There is also the aspect and possibility of religious transmission of Hanuman through the Tibetan Buddhist and Khotanese traditions of the Ramayana, notably culminating through the Dai ethnic group and their version of Ramayana, known as the Lanka Xihe, or the ten heads of Lanka (referring to Ravana), scholars estimate that the Ramayana story might have reached the Dai people even before the spread of Buddhism, by the means of trade between India and China.[15]”
Kingzwbq (talk) 05:10, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Change Minetest to either "Luanti" or "Luanti (formerly Minetest)" 5.195.47.111 (talk) 08:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request that...the Current and legit Founder/CEO on LVMH Laura Aguirre is the owner Founder/CEO of the LVMH Company since 1997, Mr. Arnault is an Advisor for the company since 2019. announcements. 2603:8081:8BF0:A50:CC89:1C7:60AA:75EE (talk) 11:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @2603:8081:8BF0:A50:CC89:1C7:60AA:75EE: What’s the title of the article? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Change "In that same month, according to Gallup, just 24% of Palestinians supported a two-state solution, a drop from 59% in 2012.[126]" to "Polls from before the 7 october massacre show that just 24% of Palestinians support a two-state solution, a drop from 59% in 2012.[126]"
Now the contents of the quoted source [126] are misrepresented. The poll among palestinians was conducted BEFORE the 7 october massacre. GRoorda (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
16 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I want to replace links to old photos with links to better photos Kent Wang (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to keep using AutoWikiBrowser to better add WikiProjects to talk pages in other languages, such as those in the Vietnamese versions of Establishments in Italy by year, as well as fixing (not necessarily removing like before) unknown parameters in templates. OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
I would love to use this for category maintenance and WikiProject tagging across a wide spread of articles quickly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 22:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
I would like to use AWB for fixing various puntuations and citations issues found on WP:NPP and articles within my scope as sometimes it's hard to notice it. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
I need to add 'Flag of X District' and 'Flag of Y Region' categories to around 3,000 Slovakian flags, doing just about 5% manually took a full day. EnzoTC (talk) 04:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
I write to request permission to use AutoWikiBrowser to facilitate identification of duplicate references; I understand that the tool only identifies exact duplicates, and that I must check every edit before saving it. spida-tarbell 𐡸 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
There are about 200 templates at Category:South Korea pop music group navigational boxes, Category:Girl group navigational boxes, and Category:Boy band navigational boxes that are members of content categories and shouldn't be per the guideline at WP:CAT#T. Hoping to automate their removal. RachelTensions (talk) 02:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights I need to help I make good edits that are very good I help revert vandalism Gladcape2013 (talk) 20:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I'd like to request NPR rights. I have prior experience with AfC and NPP, so I'm familiar with the process of reviewing new pages. I'm confident in my understanding of notability guidelines and can easily spot paid/COI editing, as well as unreliable and branded sources. I am also familiar with WP:DP, WP:NOBITING, and CSD I understand the importance of careful, fair reviews and will do my best to uphold the quality of content on Wikipedia. Thank you! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I recently completed my 90 day trial period, and have been successful with my new page reviews. I am looking to renew so I may continue my work with reviewing. OnlyNanotalk 14:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, Im contributing to wiki nearly a decade; my edit count is near 600. From the last two months, I've been actively contributing or trying to. Can I be considered a reviewer? Thanks! UzbukUdash (talk) 17:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I have sufficient experience with the deletion process and have been very active on WP:AFD where I have made policy based votes and feel very comfortable evaluating notability. Please see my AFD history. I have also read and understood the content policies and guidelines. RangersRus (talk) 21:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I’m a past administrator, an editor since 2007, with 80,000 edits, and excellent AfD record. I would like new page reviewer rights so as to help reduce the terrible backlog. Thanks in advance. Bearian (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
RE-Request Hello, again. Recently reached the 500-edit count in main category. I'm here in the wiki nearly ten years; can I be a reviewer? In earlier request, I got confused with the criteria of edit count. thanks! UzbukUdash (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, I have been volunteering with the goal to improve the WikiProject for the last 5 years, creating and updating articles mostly in the political area while trying to maintain as high impartiality as possible as well as following all rules established. I've since last year been granted Autopatrolled and in the granted message got asked to consider volunteering for this role too which i'm willing to do, to essentially help with making sure new articles (in the backlog) are in line with the rules. BastianMAT (talk) 13:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to assist in clearing out the backlog and maintaining the expected quality of new content. I have a few months of experience in AfC reviewing, and somewhat less experience with AfD, but occasionally monitor the PROD and speedy deletion categories and have PRODed some un-improvable articles in the past when working through Category:Unassessed articles (though at the time I didn't have the PROD log set up). I aim to help other editors understand Wikipedia's policies in a straightforward and friendly way, new or otherwise, to help them in the new page creation process and to reduce the burden on reviewers in the future. Reconrabbit 14:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I have been active on Wikipedia for a while, focusing on improving content quality and helping maintain the integrity of articles. I am not new to reviewing edits, as I use edit-request tools to answer several requests by unregistered/registered editors that wish to see changes on several articles. I have read all policies on how to handle this right and know the responsibly that comes alongside it. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I like helping out and reviewing recent changes, and I would like to be able to contribute further by receiving pending changes reviewer rights. Imconfused3456talk 01:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help contribute to the Wikipedia community and help reviews happen quicker. I am passionate about unbiased true information being presented and I think this would be a good privilege for me. BittersweetParadox (talk) 07:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I have been reviewing changes on many pages made by editors and IPs and helped by improving and protecting pages from vandalism. My editing history will prove that I am very capable and can be great help. I did set aside time and read and understood guidelines for vandalism, Reviewing pending changes and Protection policies before submitting this request. RangersRus (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I often review recent changes and find myself looking at a pending revision that is clearly acceptable per policies but am unable to accept it. It would be nice to contribute in this way, in addition to my existing activity reverting vandalism and other problematic edits. -OXYLYPSE (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
(Trying this again because one of my scripts broke the template) I have been reverting vandalism and patrolling recent changes for over a month now. The last time my request was declined, I simply hadn't been patrolling for a month at that point, and @Fastily had no other objections. I have consistently warned all vandals I reverted and reported many to AIV. I believe I'm ready to have rollback now. Also note that I am a pending changes reviewer. TheWikiToby (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been RC patrolling for a month combined and have the needed mainspace edits. I always warn users when reverting their edits, either with the default warning template or a custom one if the situation is unique. I think I understand the policies here, as all of my reports to WP:AIV, WP:RPP and WP:UAA have resulted in action. I would like Rollback because using more advanced tools like Huggle would make my RC patrolling easier. Thanks for your time! MolecularPilot 08:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I have been policing many pages and have reverted many vandalism by IPs and disruptive editors and added warnings on talk pages of the users. I have done this for a while now. I have also reported on ANI about vandalism. Rollback rights will make it more easier to help with vandalism and I am ready to accept this role. RangersRus (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Requesting rollback to assist with reverting vandalism. I was granted this previously on a temporary basis a few years but later took a break and never renewed it. Thanks in advance. -OXYLYPSE (talk) 21:26, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 135 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 15 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 8 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 490 |
Templates for deletion | 53 |
Categories for deletion | 117 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 23 |
All redirects for discussion | 309 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 4 |
Possible copyright violations | 25 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 194 |
All files proposed for deletion | 36 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 2 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 413 |
Unknown copyright status | 29 |
Unknown source | 19 |
No non-free use rationale | 2 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
Disputed non-free use images | 8 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,239 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 441 |
Protected against vandalism | 5 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,315 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,380 | 0.5 |
All articles needing rewrite | 5,954 | 0.09 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,321 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 39,369 | 0.57 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 11,056 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 530,337 | 7.69 |
All articles lacking sources | 81,116 | 1.18 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 710 | 0.06 |
All articles needing additional references | 467,199 | 6.77 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,600 | 0.07 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,777 | 1.53 |
All articles with dead external links | 311,590 | 4.52 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 145 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 17 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,478 | 0.02 |
All articles to be split | 806 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 2 | - |
Stub categories | 19,245 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 968 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 53,698 | 0.78 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,652 | 0.04 |
All articles with style issues | 19,412 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,760 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,559 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 364 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,622 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,757 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 6 |
All articles to be expanded | 66,184 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]Misc
[edit]Delete | Keep | Neutral | Oppose | Support | Note | Template |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |